Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Jones's avatar

I'm not sure anyone doubts the cause of the potholes it's the supervision of the repair work that voters feel needs to be done much better.

I made an FOI request after you mentioned that the contractors are penalised for faulty workmanship and forced to repair, for free, any potholes where the repair has failed.

Given how quickly repairs seem to fall apart I was interested to see how much money had been recovered for taxpayers.

Reference: FOI-202601007608

Date: 09/02/2026

The Cambridgeshire County Council response read :-

------------------------------------------

The Council’s highways contractor is required to make good any identified quality issues within 28 days of being notified about them, which includes pothole repairs.

Where the contractor fails to address these issues in 28 days, the Council assesses the cost of correcting the defect and the contractor is required to fund this re-work, fully.

The Council undertakes random audits and inspects pothole repairs, as well as other work undertaken by the contractor, to ensure required contractual and quality standards are being met. Since October 2025, the Council has undertaken 122 defect inspections across 2,403 reactive maintenance orders.

10 of these defect inspections resulted in the contractor not having been assessed to meet the required standards, with repairs being reworked fully at their expense.

------------------------------------------

So out of 2,403 holes repaired since October only 122 have been quality inspected and of those 122 only 10 have been repaired for free.

It doesn't seem to me that the inspection or quality feedback loop is working very well for taxpayers.

No posts

Ready for more?